Guy at a Denver meetup told me my chemtrail posts had zero sources, so now I lead with the FOIA docs
He said 3 paragraphs of vibes and no links just makes people scroll past. Started posting the actual EPA air sampling PDFs first and my replies stopped being people mocking me, now it's mostly questions about the data. Anyone else get their whole approach flipped by one blunt comment?
Man, this is the same thing I keep running into at work, at the DMV, everywhere. People don't argue with facts half the time, they argue with the shape of your argument. Give them a wall of text with no receipts and their brain just files you under "loud guy" and moves on. Lead with the document, the screenshot, the number, and suddenly you're a person with a case instead of a person with a take. It's wild how one link does more than three paragraphs of being right ever will.