That client who talked me into using a flat rate for web updates finally proved me wrong
I used to hate flat rate pricing for freelance web maintenance. I always charged by the hour because I figured some months would be light and others heavy. But after a year of tracking my time for this one client in Portland, I realized the flat rate actually covered all the random small fixes and kept my income steady. They paid $150 a month and I averaged about 3 hours of work each month, which came out to $50 an hour. That was better than my hourly rate of $45 because I didn't have to haggle over every little change. So tell me, has anyone else switched from hourly to flat rate and regretted it or loved it?
Right there with you on this one. Flat rate totally changed how I handle my smaller clients too, it's such a relief not having to track every single five-minute fix. I had one client who would send over these tiny text changes constantly and before I switched I was sending invoices for like $12 and it felt ridiculous. Now I just lump it all into one predictable payment and the math works out way better than I expected. It's funny how the thing I was most scared of turned out to be the best move for my sanity...
Yeah, flat rate saved me from nickel-and-diming clients over tiny tweaks. It forces you to actually estimate your workload better instead of chasing hours. Totally worth the switch in my experience.
Started tracking my time with a flat rate for a client in Seattle who wanted unlimited small changes. Turned out they emailed me at least twice a week with tiny requests like updating a phone number or swapping out a photo. My hourly rate was $50, and I was spending about 6 hours a month on their account, which meant I was basically giving them a discount at $150 a month. Ended up raising the flat rate to $200 and they didn't even blink. So yeah, the experiment worked for me once I got the numbers right.